Professional Quality Ink Jet Prints Save Time & Money

Technology Assessment

I found the Epson 3800 had a good price, good quality, and low cost/print. I had been watching printer technologies and reading reviews from professional photographers for years, but until now I didn"t feel the technology met the quality level with a less than 2 year return-on-investment. The under $1000 units didn"t have the archival quality and/or were too costly to operate. These units had low volume cartridges that doubled the cost per print and some printers didn"t offer individual color cartridges. In addition, these units didn"t have acceptable black and white images because they didn"t offer specific cartridges to produce a true black, which is important with client"s ever-increasing interest in black and white prints. The units above $2000 were geared for a higher volume with roll stock and no option for sheet feeding. Since my clients request many paper types and textures, I need to keep a small inventory of different paper; buying a roll of each different type would not be cost effective. The Epson printer fit in the $1000 to $1500 range with sheet feed and 9 individual archival inks.

Results

Printing only twice a month, I had concerns about frequent color calibration and wasted time and materials setting up the printer before each print job. Even with my erratic usage, the printer stays calibrated and the jets do not clog, so I can start a print job without requiring a test page. I found that the printer"s cost of operation offered a 35% to 64% savings over the online photofinisher. I recorded the ink level percentage for each cartridge and the paper square footage that I was printing on after each print job. I had produced about 25% of my prints as black and white and the color prints were portraits, so the black & white and magenta cartridges depleted 50% faster than the others. A full set of cartridges for the printer can cost about $450 (9 cartridges x $50/cartridge), but with the ability to replace individual cartridges, it"s not a high cost per print. On Epson Ultra Premium Luster paper, it is costing $0.0083 per sq inch or $1.27 in ink, $1.20 in paper, and $2.48 total per 11 x 14 print. Other sizes are proportional (ex. $0.56 for a 5x7 and $1.29 for an 8x10 print for paper and ink). Compared to the photofinisher"s costs, my return-on-investment was less than a year. I was pleasantly surprised to find a labor savings as well. With an Internet photofinisher, I needed to follow a serial workflow with strict image sizing and naming standards, I needed to upload the images after finishing all of the retouching and work through the online ordering process in order to ensure the order was correct. With the in-house ink jet printer, I can print as I finish retouching each image. With the use of Adobe Lightroom"s Print module, this requires no additional time to print. An added benefit is seeing the results as you go and if you need to adjust an image (ex. Missing a spot in retouching), you can do it on-the-fly.

Summary

I don"t print all jobs on the ink jet printer. It is excellent for proofs and keeping my portfolios up-to-date. When it comes to wedding prints and premium priced jobs, I still use the high-end photofinisher, which prints on traditional Kodak E-Surface with the luster finish. Thus, 80% of my printing is now accomplished on the Epson 3800 with archival quality Epson K3 ink jet technology






Add your comment:
Your name:
Site Address: http://
Your message:
Enter todays date, 2 digits
(spam):
 

Popular Materials

How Photo Hosting Can Promote You?

If you are just starting your own business as a photographer or you are simply doing this as hobby then photo hosting is for you. Photo hosting is a way wherein you can share your pictures with anyone in any part of the world without even paying for membership fees. All you need is your digital camera and your computer and you can easily share your work to the world.


The Thematic and Dynamic Chess Method

Chess is in the eye of the I, the innermost expression of the true self. In order to master chess you have to master yourself. As we improve in chess, we will also improve within ourselves. Concentration will be deepened, control over the self will be increased. As we÷  to learn to control the chessboard÷  we also÷  learn to control ourselves.÷  Thus chess is both a meditation and a game. Chess is a lot of sound and fury signifying everything and everything is an illusion. In the early 1930"s a Russian psychologist did an amazing experiment. He took two groups of chess players, one strong and one weak, and showed them chess positions for a duration of two seconds. After the time was up the position was removed from view and the player was asked to reconstruct as much of the position as he could. Master and grandmaster strength players were able to reconstruct about 90% of the position, while weaker players were able to only place about 50% or less of the pieces correctly.÷  At first blush this result would seem to stem from the fact that good chess players may have better memories than poor players. But in the second part of the experiment,÷  positions were shown that had been constructed by randomly placing pieces on the board. In this part of the experiment, the good players did not do any better than the poor ones. What this shows is that good chess players see some structure in a chess position. This structure aids in the way the position is perceived thus allowing the better player to perceive more of the position in terms of its "meaning" rather÷  than as a set of individual pieces. The concept used in this website is based on this experiment. Positions are shown and explained and the student is then shown puzzles which he has to solve based on those positions. ÷